If you’re going to submit, you’re going to get rejections. It’s part of the whole dynamic of writing. Most of these you can’t take personally, even though most you’re bound to.
They can range for insulting to, believe it or not, good.
Dear Pete,
Thank you for submitting ‘Of Cabbages and Cribbage’ to Redstone Science Fiction. We are going to pass on your story.
Your story is well-written, and you turn the idea of the ‘man in the machine’ around quite well. Ultimately it’s not the type of story we are looking to publish, it has more of an ‘Alfred Hitchcock presents’ feel to it, but we did enjoy it.
We liked the attitude in your story and hope to see more of your work. We’re next open for submissions in May, and look forward to hearing from you then.
This is the best rejection I’ve ever received. Silly to say that, but it’s well thought out, succinct and expresses real rational reasons for rejection. A class act.
That was followed by this rejection to a different publication;
Dear Peter,
Thank you for the opportunity to read “On Cabbages and Cribbage.” Unfortunately, your story isn’t quite what we’re looking for right now.
In the future, we’d appreciate it if you formatted the story in standard manuscript format (SMF). You can find out more about SMF here: http://www.shunn.net/format/story.html
Sincerely,
As if somewhere in the future, they are going to be stuck for a story to finish an issue and then, out of the blue, “I Got It! A story I rejected a few years ago and told him the time wasn’t right for it. It will be perfect!”
And on top of that what he added, on the patterned form rejection, makes it sounds as if he wants me to format and send “the story” again. As if the editor of a sci-fi magazine where anti gravity is common place and physics is a play thing of man can’t figure out how to open a .docx instead of a .doc.
But then there is something much worst than rejection. Something that even the “No thanks” response (which sometimes is the best of all) pales before. That is the non-response.
You wonder day-after-day after checking your in box if they even received it. And if they did receive it, why didn’t they send you anything? So you wait until the query date and then finally you send something else out;
Dear Editor’s,
I just thought I’d write a note and find out how you and my story are getting along. I couldn’t really get a good indicator from the site as to how long I should wait, so at the risk of being pushy I’d thought I’d drop a line.
I hate to bother you because we both know you’re busy with your Bizzaro site to run, magazines to publish and hanging out with all your friends at Bizzarro.con, but it’s just we worry about you sometimes. Worried that you’re eating right, getting enough sleep and taking care of that thing you’re supposed to be taking care of we promised never to talk about again.
I open the .doc file the other night and caught it sitting on the edge hard drive sniffling a bit. I asked if something was wrong and it said, “Nothing”, but we both know that sometimes there is an adjustment period. Perhaps a sense of loss that happens when something’s gone and you think about everything you could have done before sending a submission out into the world. It’s something you never get over.
In a way, I suppose that the world’s a big, ugly place full of leaking black slush and the light at the end of the tunnel is only that way because it’s radioactive. We know. After a while you find out the glow is pretty and the tunnel’s pretty friggin’ cool.
Take care,
Carter J Peters*
In this day in age multiple sites out there are handling the submission process; this should never happen. Gone, should be, the age where editors divide submissions between slush readers and hope that none are lost or dealt with improperly.
For those of you interested, here are the stats from Duotrope on the “Magazine for Bizzaro Fiction”;
Responses (70.00 %) Acceptances: 5.00 % (0 avg. days per acceptance) Rejections: 65.00 % (47.1 avg. days per rejection) | 61.54 % personal, 23.08 % form, 15.38 % unspecified Rewrite Requests: – Non-Responses (30.00 %) Lost / Never Responded: 10.00 % (142 avg. days before reporting submissions as lost or never responded) Author Withdrawals: 20.00 % (116 avg. days per withdrawal by author)
Withdrawals count as responses, so they lose around 50%.
Damn….
I should have done a better job looking into a site before I submitted. Your work is your baby. Make sure you are not leaving on the roof of the car as you drive away.
*(Yes, the answer is for those few, if any, who read this, this is in response to the submission I sent out here http://carterpete.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/please-dont-publish/)